I know… it’s not ‘pure’, but it does the trick so well… I then found another approach which works as far as I can tell in all browsers, does not use JS or Flash and answered my requirements. Depending on what is was going on page load, there was no sure way to control the process. But its JS was conflicting with other elements and I did not like the fact that the image could not fade in nicely all the time.
#Download firefox 3.6 for windows 10 full#
One thing I wanted to find is a cross browser solution whichĪ) Resized using the center for the image and not the top partī) Was able to fade in on page load (with full ‘preloading’ control)Ĭ) Used a minimum amount of code for fast page rendering. I’ve been exploring all kinds of non-flash fullscreen solutions for my designs. It had some cleverness, but wasn’t quite as good as either CSS technique now presented above. Just for posterity’s sake, there is another example in here called table.php which uses an old technique that used to be a part of this article. Always cool to see techniques “in the wild.”
#Download firefox 3.6 for windows 10 free#
If you use this, please feel free to leave what technique you used and if you altered it in any way in the comments below. Note that screen width isn’t the only possible good information to have when choosing an image size. We set a fixed and centered background on it, then adjust it’s size using background-size set to the cover keyword. We’ll use the html element (better than body as it’s always at least the height of the browser window).
![download firefox 3.6 for windows 10 download firefox 3.6 for windows 10](https://www.itechtics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Install-and-update-new-version-of-Firefox-670x384.jpg)
We can do this purely through CSS thanks to the background-size property now in CSS3.
![download firefox 3.6 for windows 10 download firefox 3.6 for windows 10](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-4AGUxZXZeDo/XJDUiFkoBWI/AAAAAAAAOPc/nKKv1tZ0CXghCeKglVGwYnZ8LEBKXhi7wCLcBGAs/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/Download%2BFIREFOX%2B65%2BOFFLINE%2BINSTALLER%2B2019%2BWINDOWS%252C%2BLINUX%252C%2BmacOS_agunkzscreamo_blog.jpg)
As cross-browser compatible as possible.Retains image proportions (aspect ratio).Fills entire page with image, no white space.The goal here is a background image on a website that covers the entire browser window at all times. Both original methods are removed and now replaced by four new methods. Even if a post is submitted through an open proxy before the scan completes, Slashdot's delay between posts from the same IP will ensure that only one post can get through before the ban hammer comes down.This post was originally published on Augand is now updated as it has been entirely revised. Better yet, kick the scan off in the background while the data is being entered data into the form and reject the post if necessary when the "Preview" or "Submit" button is clicked. If you really feel the need to do this, which the Slashdot team obviously does, it would be much quicker and less annoying for users do the scan at a faster rate without the two or three retries currently used. What's so irksome about it is that it's a straight SYN scan done very slowly that impacts any users that have a firewall that DROPs packets with an apparently inexplicable delay of several seconds. I'd have to go digging through my logs to get the complete list, but I'd guess there are about a dozen ports checked in total. The ports scanned are all common default ports for web proxy applications like Squid's :3128, various ":8080" type combinations and such like. Still not scared? Then you might survive extension-writing long enough to get around to the RDF stuff. Now to make that clusterfuck do anything, you have to use a dialect of Javascript that makes COBOL look terse.
![download firefox 3.6 for windows 10 download firefox 3.6 for windows 10](https://www.linuxbabe.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/check-firefox-version-on-ubuntu.png)
So far I've only named the bare minimum necessary to make a UI that does nothing. Want to display an image? XUL doesn't have the tag, or a box model with sufficient control to embed a background image, but hey you can use "list-style-image"! Oh and since it's XUL you get to have fun with overlays, which are like includes except they work in an XML/XSLT way.Īt this point, I'd like to mention the average human brain can only hold 7 items in short term memory at once. You can keep your CSS too - along with getting to learn a metric assload of browser extensions to the syntax and creative ways to hack the existing vocabulary to get results. Actually, you can keep the HTML in addition. Take away all the HTML you know and replace it with XUL, a completely different XML language with a different box model. But as a FF extension writer, you don't get the luxury of preserving your sanity. If this were Chrom(e|ium) you could stop reading here this is how their extensions work. Let's imagine for a second that you're writing a HTML web page with some scripting. Why do FF developers hate their own extension framework dammit!?